The Rareness of Books: Comparing
Amazon and WorldCat
Ted Gentle
The
Gentle/Scorsese Writer Librarian
701
Brookhill Circle
Pell City,
AL 35125
So much of being a librarian is
being an antiquarian, and that involves the simple act of finding a book. When a patron, in an act similar to
consulting his local Family Video, simply asks for a good book to read, and the
librarian desires to leave the confines of his or her catalog, where does that
librarian turn? Is the answer a
bestseller, or an obscure work from small press? The answer, inevitably, is to provide access
to the greatest amount of variety as possible.
With that having been said, which serves that need the best, the
bookseller Amazon or the open catalog WorldCat?
With Amazon, the big win is
accessibility, with books being quick to purchase and quick to deliver. There is access to multiple works, including
books, DVDs, and other items. One can
buy the book or DVD version of Shutter Island, or multiple editions and
commentaries on Moby Dick. Pricing can
be expensive, although the used editions are usually much cheaper. Amazon also has a reputation for a rather
ruthless business approach, although this can also be present at certain,
overrun libraries! One can argue that,
like Facebook, a new expectation for librarians is familiarity and use of this
website.
Where does that leave us with
WorldCat? One can observe that WorldCat
does not allow you to buy the book, but does lead to greater awareness of what is
present in various libraries and from various small publishers. It’s role is mainly as an archive, where one
can look up his or her old student projects or those of an old Professor. If you can believe that Post-Colonial
Literature is less a body of books, and more of a resource or more, then
WorldCat is a resource that would help a librarian in his or her research
responsibilities.
Will there ever come a day when
Amazon and WorldCat merge? The greatest
dilemma facing librarians today is whether they can agree on a single,
open-source website such as OverDrive that can provide all of the articles,
books, and more. Would we call this
website AmazonCat, and have pricing dealt with by a third party? Is Walmart’s Vudu a positive sign of change,
with almost all of the movies physically available through Netflix now
streamable there?
One can certainly see an immense
need for Amazon and WorldCat, with each website having its own strengths and
weaknesses. However, one can also
identify a large amount of disorganization in the physical library systems
themselves. One can hope that these
physical libraries, if their use continues, serve as an access point to fewer,
similar websites with a greater amount of organization. With online apps such as Pandora being one
successful example, one hopes for a goal of free and open access.
No comments:
Post a Comment